4.7 Article

Characteristics of BPA removal from water by PACl-Al13 in coagulation process

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 337, Issue 2, Pages 408-413

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.052

Keywords

Bisphenol A; PACl-Al-13; Coagulation; Floc

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50708032]
  2. Natural Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [50225926, 50425927]
  3. Chinese National Basic Research Program [2005CB724203]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0719]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discussed the coagulation characteristics of BPA with polyaluminum chloride (PACl-Al-13) as coagulant, examined the impact of coagulation pH, PACl-Al-13 dosage. TOC (total organic carbon) and turbidity on BPA removal, and analyzed the possible dominant mechanisms in water coagulation process. Formation and performance of flocs during coagulation processes were monitored using photometric dispersion analyzer (PDA). When the concentration of humic acid matters and turbidity was low in the solution, the experimental results showed that the removal of BPA experienced increase and subsequently decrease with the PACl-Al-13 dosage increasing. The optimal PACl-Al-13 dosage was found at BPA/PACl-Al-13= 1:2.6(M/M) under our experiment conditions. Results show that the maximum BPA removal efficiency occurred at pH 9.0 due to the adsorption by Al-13 aggregates onto BPA rather than charge neutralization mechanism by polynuclear aluminous salts in the solution. The humic acid matters and kaolin in the solution have significant effect on BPA removal with PACl-Al-13 in the coagulation. The BPA removal will be weakened at high humic matters. The removal rate of BPA increased and subsequently decreased with the turbidity increasing. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available