4.7 Article

Modification of membrane heterogeneity by antipsychotic drugs: An X-ray diffraction comparative study

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 320, Issue 2, Pages 469-475

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.01.034

Keywords

X-ray diffraction; SAXS; electron density profile; phospholipid bilayers; sphingomyelin; phosphatidylcholine; cholesterol; antipsychotic; liquid-ordered phase; liquid-disordered phase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lipid mixtures are used to mimic biological membranes as they allow characterization of lipid lateral domains defined by their specific lipid molecular organization. Therapeutic agents such as antipsychotic drugs (AP) that may interact with lipids arrangement are likely to modify membrane biological properties. The present study describes the effect of 2 typical and 5 atypical antipsychotic drugs on an aqueous co-dispersion of a lipid mixture made of egg phosphatidylcholine (PC)/brain sphingomyelin (SM)/cholesterol (1/1/1 mol/mol/mol). Lamellar liquid-ordered (Lo) and liquid-disordered (Ld) phase coexistence was identified in the control and antipsychotic-added mixtures at 37 degrees C using synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering methods (XRD). Intensity of the Bragg peaks was used to generate electron density profiles (EDP) allowing bilayer thickness calculation. All antipsychotic except from amisulpride induced a Lo phase bilayer thickness (d(pp)) decrease. Chlorpromazine, haloperidol, amisulpride and 9-0H-risperidone induced a Ld d(pp) increase while ziprazidone, risperidone and clozapine induced a Ld d(pp) decrease, indicating that antipsychotic atypicality is not associated with a specific d(pp) modification on our lipid model mixture. Results are discussed in terms of competition of antipsychotic compounds with cholesterol and mode of reorganization of lateral domains. A pharmacological relevance of these changes is also discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available