4.4 Article

Differential Lateralization for Words and Faces: Category or Psychophysics?

Journal

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 2070-2087

Publisher

M I T PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20137

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [PG97 15587, G0400341]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Birkbeck
  3. University of London
  4. Medical Research Council [G9715587, G0400341] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0400341, G9715587] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This set of three experiments assessed the influence of different psychophysical factors on the lateralization of the N170 event-related potential (ERP) component to words and faces. In all experiments, words elicited a left-lateralized N170, whereas faces elicited a right-lateralized or nonlateralized N170 depending on presentation conditions. Experiment 1 showed that lateralization for words (but not for faces) was influenced by spatial frequency. Experiment 2 showed that stimulus presentation time influenced N170 lateralization independently of spatial frequency composition. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that stimulus size and resolution did not influence N170 lateralization, but did influence N170 amplitude, albeit differentially for words and faces. These findings suggest that differential lateralization for words and faces, at least as measured by the N170, is influenced by spatial frequency (words), stimulus presentation time, and category.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available