4.4 Article

Corrosion protection of AISI 316 stainless steel by ALD alumina/titania nanometric coatings

Journal

JOURNAL OF COATINGS TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 655-659

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11998-011-9327-0

Keywords

ALD; AISI 316; Nanometric coatings; Al2O3; TiO2; Corrosion protection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stainless steels are used today in a wide range of applications as a result of their combination of high corrosion resistance and good mechanical properties. In some applications, for example, temporary contact biomedical devices or solar water heaters, corrosion resistance may need further improvement, and surface coatings may be applied for enhanced protection. In this study, AISI 316 stainless steel samples with two different standard industrial finishes were coated using atomic layer deposition (ALD) of Al2O3/TiO2 layers. The morphology, composition and corrosion protection was then investigated using different techniques. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to obtain a morphological characterization of coatings and substrates. Glow discharge optical emission spectrometry (GDOES) was used to obtain an in-depth profile of composition. Polarization curves in a 0.2 M NaCl solution were used to evaluate the corrosion protection given by the coatings. The deposited ALD layers were found to be almost flawless. The measured RMS roughness values were compared before and after the ALD, and were around 50 and 370 nm for the two samples. GDOES profiles were strongly influenced by the roughness of the substrate. The corrosion protection obtained on AISI 316 stainless steel by the application of nanometric coatings proved to be very effective in reducing the passive region current density from 10(-7) to less than 10(-9) A/cm(2) and increasing the passive region potential interval from 0.8 to 1.3 V before breakdown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available