4.6 Article

Risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-chemotherapy: A meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 209-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.03.010

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus; Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Rituximab; Reactivation; Meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The addition of Rituximab to standard chemotherapy (C) has been reported to improve the end of treatment outcome in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Nevertheless, rituximab has been associated with hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV-R). Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to research the relationship between rituximab and HBV-R. Study design: We searched the commonly used databases both in English and Chinese from November 1997 to June 30, 2012. Meta-analysis was performed in fixed/random-effects models using Review Manager 5.1 and STATA 10.0. Publication bias was examined through Egger's test and Begg's funnel plot. Results: Nine eligible articles were selected in this review (8 studies in English and 1 studies in Chinese), which included 971 adult patients and met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of rituximab-associated HBV-R cases reported through case series (n = 387), 304 were HBcAb (+)/HBsAg (-) and 83 HBsAg (+). The pooled effect of rituximab-based therapy on HBV-R significantly increased under fixed-effects model [ Relative risk (RR) 2.14, 95% CI 1.42-3.22, P = 0.0003]. In subgroup analysis, rituximab-associated HBV-R in isolated HBcAb (+) patients remained high, and the RR was 5.52 (95% CI 2.05-14.85, P = 0.0007). The RR of HBV-R in NHL patients with HBsAg (+) treated with R-based therapy when compared with the control population was 1.63 by the random-effects model. Conclusions: Rituximab therapy may increase the risk of developing HBV-R in NHL patients with HBcAb(+). (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available