4.6 Article

High non-responsiveness of males and the elderly to standard hepatitis B vaccination among a large cohort of healthy employees

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 262-264

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.07.003

Keywords

Hepatitis B vaccination; Ageing; Immunosenescence; Immune response

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Hepatitis B virus infection is a major health problem. Although non-response is known to increase with age, hepatitis B vaccinations are considered to have only minor non-response rates (anti-HBs < 10 IU/L) in healthy subjects. Objectives: The aim of this study was to quantify immunosenescence in a large retrospective cohort of 11,439 healthy adults who received HBV immunisation according to the standard vaccination regime. Study design: We evaluated the response to the standard three-dose vaccination regimen, consisting of 20-mu g doses of the HbsAg recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine, among 11,439 healthy employees using a retrospective cohort design. Logistic regression was applied to predict the non-response rate, and multivariate regression analysis was applied to predict antibody response. Predictors of responsiveness included sex, age and time between the last vaccination and antibody titre measurement. Results: From the age of 29 on in men and 43 on in women, more than 5% of subjects did not respond. Compared with women, men had a higher risk of non-response and exhibited a steeper decline in antibody titres produced with increasing age. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study demonstrates that immunosenescence starts at young age, especially among men, underlining the importance of vaccination at a young age to achieve long-lasting immunity. Moreover, HBV vaccination should always include testing for antibodies to facilitate the performance of necessary interventions to prevent long-term fatal complications. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available