4.6 Article

Prevalence of antibodies and RNA genome of hepatitis E virus in a cohort of French immunocompromised

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages 346-349

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.01.001

Keywords

HEV; Immunocompromised; Paris; Urban area; Genome; Antibodies

Categories

Funding

  1. Abbott

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recently, cases of chronic hepatitis E have been identified in immunocompromised patients. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of anti-HEV IgG antibodies and the persistence of HEV-RNA in sera of immunocompromised patients with regular follow-up at Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris, France. Study design: 307 samples collected from 261 HIV-infected patients and 46 kidney transplant (KT)-patients were retrospectively tested for the presence of the following hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection markers: anti-HEV IgM antibodies, anti-HEV IgG antibodies, anti-HEV IgG avidity index, and HEV-RNA. Results: Anti-HEV IgG positive serology was found in 4 HIV-infected patients (1.5%) and 3 KT-patients (6.5%), leading to an overall seroprevalence of 2.3%. HEV-RNA detection was not observed among 55 HIV-patients at higher risk of chronic HEV (<200 CD4 cells/mm(3), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and/or positive anti-HEV antibodies) and among 44 KT-patients. None of the seven patients had anti-HEV IgM antibodies, thereby excluding any acute infection. The IgG avidity index confirmed past HEV infection among tested patients. Conclusions: The low seroprevalence observed in the Paris region does not warrant a systematic evaluation of HEV infection in immunocompromised patients. However, HEV infection must be examined as a possibility if unexplained increases in ALT should occur and after more common viral hepatitis infections are excluded. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available