4.6 Article

Clinical presentation and response to treatment of novel influenza A H1N1 in a university-based summer camp population

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 286-288

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.12.012

Keywords

Influenza; Adolescent medicine; Disease outbreak; Oseltamivir

Categories

Funding

  1. Duke University Health System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Little is known about the clinical presentation and course of novel H1N1 influenza in summer camps. Objectives: To describe the clinical course and evaluate the effect of influenza treatment in a summer camp population. Study design: Two large influenza outbreaks occurred in university-based residential camps between May 21 and August 2, 2009. Through active daily surveillance, medical evaluation at symptom onset, and data collection during isolation, we describe the clinical course of a large outbreak of novel H1N1 influenza. Results: Influenza-like illness (ILI) was documented in 119 individuals. Influenza A was confirmed in 66 (79%) of 84 samples tested. Three early samples were identified as novel H1N1. ILI cases had an average age of 15.7 years and 52% were male. Sixty-three were treated with oseltamivir or zanamivir, which was initiated within 24 h of diagnosis. Cough, myalgia and sore throat occurred in 69, 64 and 63% of cases, respectively. The highest temperature over the course of illness (T-max) occurred within 48 h after symptom onset in 87.5% of individuals. Average T-max was 38.4 degrees C (range 36.1-40.2 degrees C). Among confirmed influenza cases, 69% defervesced by 72 h and 95% defervesced by 96 h. Defervescence at 72 h was not different in the treated and untreated groups (p = 0.12). Conclusions: Novel H1N1 generally has a mild, self-limited course in healthy adolescent campers. Defervescence occurred within 72 h and was unaffected by treatment. (C) 2009 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available