4.6 Article

Microbial translocation is associated with residual viral replication in HAART-treated HIV plus subjects with <50 copies/ml HIV-1 RNA

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 367-370

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.09.011

Keywords

Lipopolysaccharide; Microbial translocation; HIV infection; HAART; Viral suppression

Categories

Funding

  1. National AIDS Clinical Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent data have shown that plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are a quantitative indicator of microbial translocation in HIV infected individuals. Objectives: To assess the impact of residual viral replication on plasma LPS in HAART-treated HIV+ subjects with <50 copies/ml HIV-1 RNA and to evaluate LPS changes during repeated HAART interruptions not exceeding 2-month duration. Study design: LPS was measured in 44 HIV+ subjects at T0 (during HAART) and at day 15 of the first and fourth HAART interruption. Ten uninfected, healthy donors were studied as well. Residual plasma HIV-1 RNA was measured at T0 by an ultra-ultrasensitive method with limit of detection of 2.5 copies HIV-1 RNA/ml. Subjects with less than 2.5 copies/ml (fully suppressed - FS) were compared to those with 2.5-50 copies/ml (partially suppressed - PS). Results: At T0, plasma LPS levels were comparable in FS and uninfected subjects, whereas in PS they were higher than in uninfected subjects (p = 0.049). After 4 HAART interruptions, they did not change significantly. However, LPS values were lower in FS than in PS (p = 0.020). An inverse correlation was found between CD4 and LPS levels (p = 0.044) in PS group only. Conclusions: A reduced degree of microbial translocation was seen in subjects with a more complete suppression of viral replication. Repeated HAART interruptions had no significant impact on plasma LPS levels. (C) 2009 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available