4.6 Article

Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 260-265

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2008.07.018

Keywords

Epstein-Barr virus; T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia; Infection

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America [CA072510, CA091792]
  2. NIDCR [DE014136-04, 017338]
  3. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is closely associated with the development of a number of tumors. During latent infection, EBV continuously expresses a number of viral genes which are essential for cell transformation and maintenance of the malignant phenotype of EBV-related tumors. There has been no previous link between EBV and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL), a distinctive form of leukemia derived from T-cells at an intermediate stage of differentiation between a cortical thymocyte and a mature peripheral blood T-cell. Objective: To determine if EBV was present in the T-PLL cells collected. Study design: T-PLL cells were isolated from the peripheral blood of a patient diagnosed with T-PILL and Continuously Cultured for about I year. The existence of EBV in these cells was detected Using multiple strategies including PCR, Western blotting, immunofluorescent assay and flow cytometry analysis. Results: The EBV genome was present in these T-PLL cells by PCR analysis across multiple sites in the viral genome. In addition, these T-PLL cells expressed a number of EBV latent antigens. The EBV oncoproteins LMP1, EBNA1 and EBNA3C were expressed in the majority of the infected cells. Conclusion: This report suggests a potential link between EBV infection and T-PLL and provides new information about the potential contribution of EBV in the initiation or maintenance of T-PLL. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available