4.1 Article

Omega-3 Fatty Acid Treatment, With or Without Cytidine, Fails to Show Therapeutic Properties in Bipolar Disorder A Double-Blind, Randomized Add-on Clinical Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 699-703

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318266854c

Keywords

omega-3 fatty acids; bipolar disorder; mood stabilizers; cytidine; clinical trial

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute, Chevy Chase, MD
  2. ONO
  3. Cenerex
  4. Cardiokine
  5. Sanofi
  6. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  7. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  8. National Institutes of Health
  9. Harvard Medical School
  10. Janssen Pharmaceutica
  11. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  12. Poitras Foundation
  13. Margaret Dorrance Strawbridge Foundation
  14. Hirschhorn Foundation
  15. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  16. National Institute of Mental Health
  17. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  18. Frazier Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aimed to test the effects of omega-3 fatty acids (O3FA), given as fish oil capsules, with and without oral cytidine (CYT), a pyrimidine with reported preclinical and clinical antidepressant-like effects, in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Methods: A total of 45 outpatients with diagnosed BD (type I) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition - Text Revision, were recruited for this 4-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on study. Treatment groups were (1) oral CYT + O3FA, (2) placebo + O3FA, and (3) placebo + placebo control. O3FA was given 2 g twice a day and CYT was administered as 1 g twice a day. Results: There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in the primary outcome: study retention. Clinical measures improved in all treatment groups, and there were no significant differences between groups, including change in probability of symptoms of depression or mania, change in positive ratings of depression or mania, or change in Global Assessment of Functioning scores. Neither CYT + O3FA nor placebo + O3FA treatment was superior to placebo treatment. Rather, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend for both groups treated with O3FA to do worse than the placebo group. Conclusions: Despite preclinical studies suggesting that the effect of O3FA might be augmented with pyrimidines, add-on CYT did not substantially improve mood symptoms in BD. In addition, although a power analysis indicated that the sample size would be adequate to see beneficial effects similar to those previously reported, O3FA treatment by itself was not superior to placebo for BD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available