4.1 Article

Antidepressant Exposure as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA) Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 92-97

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318204b117

Keywords

major depressive disorder; adolescents; plasma concentration; drug exposure; optimization

Funding

  1. NIMH (Pittsburgh) [MH61835]
  2. NIMH (Galveston) [MH61856]
  3. NIMH (UCLA) [MH61864]
  4. NIMH (Portland) [MH61869]
  5. NIMH (Dallas) [MH61958]
  6. NIMH (Brown) [MH62014]
  7. Advanced Center for Early-Onset Mood and Anxiety Disorders [MH66371]
  8. Clinical Research Training in Child Psychiatry [MH18951]
  9. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  10. Abcomm, Inc
  11. Solvay
  12. Biobehavioral Diagnostics Inc
  13. Forest Laboratories
  14. Shire
  15. Somerset
  16. Philip Morris USA
  17. AstraZeneca
  18. Eli Lilly
  19. Johnson Johnson
  20. National Institute of Mental Health
  21. Organon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the relationship between plasma concentration of antidepressant and both clinical response and adverse effects in treatment-resistant depressed adolescents. Adolescents (n = 334) with major depression who had not responded to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) were randomized to 1 of 4 treatments: switch to another SSRI (fluoxetine, citalopram, or paroxetine), switch to venlafaxine, switch to SSRI plus cognitive behavior therapy, or switch to venlafaxine plus cognitive behavior therapy. Adolescents who did not improve by 6 weeks had their dose increased. Plasma concentrations of medication and metabolites were measured at 6 weeks in 244 participants and at 12 weeks in 204 participants. Adolescents treated with citalopram whose plasma concentration was equal to or greater than the geometric mean (GM) showed a higher response rate compared to those with less than the GM, with parallel but nonsignificant findings for fluoxetine. A dose increase of citalopram or fluoxetine at week 6 was most likely to result in response when it led to a change in concentration from less than the GM at 6 weeks to the GM or greater at week 12. Plasma levels of paroxetine, venlafaxine, or O-desmethylvenlafaxine were not related to clinical response. Exposure was associated with more cardiovascular and dermatologic side effects in those receiving venlafaxine. Antidepressant concentration may be useful in optimizing treatment for depressed adolescents receiving fluoxetine or citalopram.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available