4.5 Article

Bioavailability of S-Adenosyl Methionine and Impact on Response in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Major Depressive Disorder

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages 843-848

Publisher

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.11m07139

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Amarin (Laxdale)
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Cederroth
  4. Lichtwer Pharma GmbH
  5. Nordic Naturals
  6. Ganeden
  7. Swiss Medica
  8. Fisher-Wallace
  9. Abbott
  10. Alkermes
  11. Lorex
  12. Aspect Medical Systems
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Cephalon
  15. Cyberonics
  16. Eli Lilly
  17. Forest
  18. GlaxoSmithKline
  19. Johnson Johnson
  20. Novartis
  21. Organon Inc
  22. Pamlab
  23. Pfizer
  24. Pharmavite
  25. Roche
  26. Sanofi/Synthelabo
  27. Solvay
  28. Wyeth-Ayerst
  29. Belvoir Publishing
  30. Bio Research
  31. BrainCells
  32. Clinical Trial Solutions
  33. Ganeden Biotech
  34. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  35. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  36. National Institute on Drug and Alcohol Abuse
  37. National Institute of Mental Health [5-K23 MH-069629]
  38. Organon
  39. Sanofi-Aventis
  40. Shire
  41. Synthelabo
  42. Advanced Meeting Partners
  43. American Psychiatric Association
  44. Belvoir
  45. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  46. Imedex
  47. PharmaStar
  48. Massachusetts General Hospital Psychiatry Academy/Primedia
  49. Massachusetts General Hospital Psychiatry Academy/Reed-Elsevier
  50. UBC Pharma
  51. Ridge Diagnostics
  52. National Institutes of Health/National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine grant [AT002311-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To characterize the impact of S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) on homocysteine and potential risk of adverse cardiovascular effects by examining plasma levels of SAMe, S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH), total homocysteine (tHCY), methionine (MET), and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) in 35 of 73 patients from a 6-week randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of SAMe augmentation in serotonin reuptake inhibitor partial responders with DSM-IV major depressive disorder (MDD), published in 2010. Method: Subjects were randomized from June 4, 2004, until August 8, 2008, to adjunctive placebo or SAMe 800-1600 mg/d for 6 weeks. Primary outcome measures included changes in one-carbon cycle intermediates within each treatment arm (by paired t test) and between treatment arms (by independent samples t test). Univariate analysis of variance and Fisher Protected Least Significant Difference were carried out to compare posttreatment levels of each one-carbon cycle intermediate. Secondary outcome measures included associations between clinical improvement and change in plasma intermediate levels, examined by linear regression (for change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores) and logistic regression (for response or remission). Results: We found significant differences in pretreatment plasma levels of tHCY (P = .03) between the SAMe and placebo arms. Following 6 weeks of treatment, plasma SAMe (P = .002) and SAH (P < .0001) levels increased significantly in the SAMe arm; no intermediates in the placebo group changed significantly. Posttreatment plasma SAMe (P = .0035), SAH (P < .0001), and tHCY (P = .0016) levels differed significantly between the SAMe and placebo groups. No significant associations were found between plasma intermediate levels and clinical improvement, response, or remission. Conclusions: Despite concerns about the impact that SAMe therapy may have on homocysteine levels and risk of adverse cardiovascular effects, the lack of significant increase in tHCY levels after treatment suggests that no toxic effects from SAMe should be expected. Our findings, however, have some significant limitations and should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available