4.5 Article

Safety of Selegiline Transdermal System in Clinical Practice: Analysis of Adverse Events From Postmarketing Exposures

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 661-668

Publisher

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.12m07648

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline Korea
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. AstraZeneca Korea
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Korea
  5. Eli Lilly Korea
  6. KHIDI
  7. Otsuka Korea
  8. Wyeth Korea
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare
  10. Korea Research Foundation
  11. Korean Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning
  12. Pfizer
  13. Shire
  14. Merck
  15. Bristol Myers Squibb
  16. Otsuka
  17. CeNeRx
  18. Eli Lilly
  19. National Institute of Mental Health
  20. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  21. Sepracor
  22. National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Drug Abuse/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism)
  23. Duke Endowment
  24. AstraZeneca
  25. Forest
  26. Cephalon
  27. Janssen
  28. Jazz
  29. McNeil
  30. Organon
  31. Orphan
  32. Lundbeck
  33. Titan
  34. Sunovion
  35. Mylan Specialty LP, Basking Ridge, New Jersey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objective of this analysis is to present the safety profile of selegiline transdermal system (STS) in clinical practice after US Food and Drug Administration approval by analyzing reported postmarketing adverse events (AEs). Method: Deidentified data were obtained on AEs, regardless of causality, as collected and compiled in the pharmaceutical company's adverse event collection systems/databases after the launch of STS in the United States. All reports of hypertensive crisis, suicide attempts, and STS overdoses were carefully examined to independently determine relation of the AE to STS. Results: From April 2006 to October 2010, a total of 3,155 AEs in 1,516 patients were reported (5.2% of the total exposures; N = 29,141), regardless of causality. The most frequently reported categories of AEs were general disorders (no. of AEs = 1,037, 3.6%) and central nervous system (CNS) disorders (no. of AEs = 574, 2.0%). A total of 266 reports (0.9%) were classified as serious AEs; CNS disorders (no. of AEs = 71, 26.7%) and cardiac and vascular disorders (no. of AEs = 44, 16.5%) were most common. There were 13 self-reports of possible hypertensive events or hypertension, although objective clinical data were not submitted in any of these cases. Thirteen drug-drug interactions (0.04%) were reported, and 5 were classified as serious. Conclusions: The most commonly reported AEs were application site reactions and insomnia. Very few patients reported a hypertensive event, and there were no objectively confirmed reports of hypertensive crisis with food at any STS dose. Therapeutic doses of STS appear to have a safety profile in clinical practice that is consistent with that observed in clinical trials. However, given the relatively modest exposure numbers, continued safety monitoring is recommended. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73(5):661-668 (c) Copyright 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available