4.5 Review

The Effect of Exercise in Clinically Depressed Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 529-538

Publisher

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.08r04913blu

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca Denmark [pound1,500]
  2. Danish insurance companies
  3. UK Department of Health
  4. Medical Research Council [G0600705] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0600705] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of exercise in adults with clinical depression. Data Sources: The databases CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched (1806-2008) using medical subject headings (MeSH) and text word terms depression, depressive disorder and exercise, aerobic, non-aerobic, physical activity, physical fitness, walk*, jog*, run*, bicycling, swim*, strength, and resistance. Study Selection: Randomized trials including adults with clinical depression according to any diagnostic system were included. Data Extraction: Two investigators evaluated trials using a prepiloted structured form. Data Synthesis: Thirteen trials were identified that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eight had adequate allocation concealment, 6 had a blinded outcome, and 5 used intention-to-treat analyses. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) calculated using a random-effects model was -0.40 (95% CI, -0.66 to -0.14), with evidence of heterogeneity between trials (I-2=57.2%, P=.005). There was an inverse association between duration of intervention and the magnitude of the association of exercise with depression (P=.002). No other characteristics were related to between-study heterogeneity. Pooled analysis of 5 trials with long-term follow-up (ie, that examined outcomes beyond the end of the intervention) suggested no long-term benefit (SMD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.28 to 0.26), with no strong evidence of heterogeneity in this pooled analysis (I-2=23.4%, P=.27). There was no strong statistical evidence for small study bias (P>.27). Only 3 studies were assessed as high quality (adequately concealed random allocation, blinded outcome assessment, and intention-to-treat analysis). When we pooled results from these, the estimated beneficial effect of exercise was more modest (SMD, -0.19; 95% CI, -0.70 to 0.31) than the pooled result for all 13 studies, with no strong evidence of benefit. Conclusions: Our results suggest a short-term effect of exercise on depression: on average, depression scores 0.4 of a standard deviation lower in clinically depressed patients randomly assigned to an exercise intervention at the end of that intervention compared to those randomly assigned to a none exercise group. There is little evidence of a long-term beneficial effect of exercise in patients with clinical depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(4):529-538 (C) Copyright 2010 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available