4.1 Article

Pediatric Vancomycin Dosing: Trends Over Time and the Impact of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 212-220

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.402

Keywords

vancomycin; pediatrics; therapeutic drug monitoring

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR001425, UL1TR001067] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR001425, UL1 TR001067] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monitoring of vancomycin trough concentrations is recommended for pediatric patients in the product label and by several professional societies. However, among a network of freestanding children's hospitals vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) practices were reported to be highly variable. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether trends in vancomycin use and TDM changed across a large healthcare delivery system in Utah and Idaho from 2006 to 2012. Children <= 18 years who received >= 2 vancomycin doses were included. Overall, vancomycin TDM was performed during 5,035 (80%) of 6,259 hospital encounters, in which 85,442 doses were administered and 7,935 concentrations were obtained. Across this time period, the median trough concentration increased from 10.9 to 13.7 mu g/mL (P<.001), which temporally coincided with recommendations published by the Infectious Disease Society of America that recommend targeting higher trough concentrations. Two or more abnormally low trough concentrations were accompanied by an increase in the dose 75% of the time. Similarly, >= 2 abnormally high trough concentrations were followed by a decrease in the dose 35% of the time. In aggregate, these data suggest that vancomycin TDM is commonly performed among children and the majority of abnormal trough concentrations were associated with an appropriate modification to the dosing regimen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available