4.1 Article

Clinical Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Allopurinol Users

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 211-216

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0091270012439715

Keywords

allopurinol; adverse events; risk factors

Funding

  1. Korea Healthcare technology R&D project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A084204, A030001]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A084204] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allopurinol, one of the most commonly used uric acidlowering agents, can cause serious adverse events. To investigate the risk factors for allopurinol-induced adverse events, the authors enrolled 94 patients who developed allopurinol-induced adverse events and 378 controls who were randomly chosen from 1934 patients who used allopurinol but did not develop any adverse events in this retrospective case control study. Univariate analysis showed that patients who developed allopurinol-induced adverse events had more chronic kidney disease (46% vs 30%, P = .005), more hypertension (42% vs 30%, P = .036), less tumor lysis syndrome (P = .030), higher cholesterol (P = .013), and lower aspartate aminotransferase (P = .002) and alanine aminotransferase levels (P = .033) and more commonly used angiotensin receptor blockers (27% vs 15%, P = .007), colchicines (16% vs 5%, P = .010), or statins (19% vs 8%, P = .002) than those who did not. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the use of colchicines (odds ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-7.58; P = .012) and statins (2.10; 1.03-4.25; P = .041) was an independent risk factor predicting adverse events in allopurinol users. In conclusion, patients who use colchicine or statins are at significant risk for developing allopurinol-induced adverse events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available