4.1 Article

Evaluation of Exposure Change of Nonrenally Eliminated Drugs in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 91S-108S

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0091270011415528

Keywords

renal impairment; drug-drug interaction; PBPK; combined intrinsic and extrinsic factors

Funding

  1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic kidney disease, or renal impairment (RI) can increase plasma levels for drugs that are primarily venally cleared and for some drugs whose renal elimination is not a major pathway. We constructed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for 3 nonrenally eliminated drugs (sildenafil, repaglinide, and telithromycin). These models integrate drug-dependent parameters derived from in vitro, in silico, and in vivo data, and system-dependent parameters that are independent of the test drugs. Plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of test drugs were simulated in subjects with severe RI and normal renal function. respectively. The simulated versus observed areas under the concentration versus time curve changes (AUCR, severe RI/normal/were comparable for slidenafil (2.2 vs 2.0) and telithromycin (1.6 vs 1.9). For repaglinide. the initial, simulated AUCR was lower than that observed (1.2 vs 3.0). The underestimation was corrected once the estimated changes in transporter activity were incorporated into the model. The simulated AUCR values were confirmed using a static, clearance concept model. The PBPK models were further used to evaluate the changes in pharmacokinetic profiles of sildenefil metabolite by RI and of telithromycin by RI and co-administration with ketoconazole. The simulations demonstrate the utility and challenges of the PBPK approach in evaluating the pharmocokinetics of nonrenally cleared drugs in subjects with RI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available