4.1 Article

Treatment With Liraglutide-a Once-Daily GLP-1 Analog-Does Not Reduce the Bioavailability of Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Taken as an Oral Combination Contraceptive Drug

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 12, Pages 1696-1703

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0091270010389471

Keywords

Liraglutide; oral contraceptives; drug interactions; pharmacokinetics

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liraglutide is a once-daily human GLP-1 analog for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Like other GLP-1 analogs, liraglutide delays gastric emptying, which could potentially affect absorption of concomitantly administered oral drugs. This study investigated the effect of liraglutide on the pharmacokinetics of the components of an oral contraceptive (ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel). Postmenopausal healthy women (n = 21) were included. A single dose of this contraceptive was administered. Blood samples for ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel measurements were drawn until 74 hours post dosing of the contraceptive during liraglutide and placebo treatments. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) (1.06; 90% CI, 0.99-1.13) for ethinyl estradiol (during liraglutide and placebo) was within defined limits, demonstrating equivalence. The 90% CI for the ratio of AUC for levonorgestrel was not fully contained within the limits (1.18; 90% CI, 1.04-1.34) (levonorgestrel AUC was 18% greater with liraglutide vs placebo). However, equivalence was demonstrated for levonorgestrel AUC(0-t) (1.15; 90% CI, 1.06-1.24). Equivalence was not demonstrated for maximum concentration (C-max); values for ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel C-max were 12% and 13% lower with liraglutide versus placebo, respectively. Both reached C-max similar to 1.5 hours later with liraglutide. No clinically relevant reduction in bioavailability of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel occurred.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available