4.1 Article

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Basis for Effective Argatroban Dosing in Pediatrics

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 19-28

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0091270010365550

Keywords

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; argatroban; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; activated plasma thromboplastin time (aPTT); simulation

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Encysive Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of argatroban in pediatric patients and derive dosing recommendations. An open-label multicenter trial was conducted in pediatric patients (n = 18 from birth to 16 years). A population modeling approach was used to characterize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of argatroban in pediatric patients. Simulations were performed to derive a dosing regimen for pediatric patients. The estimated clearance of argatroban in pediatric patients was 2-fold lower than that in healthy adults. Body weight was significant predictor of argatroban clearance. The clearance in a typical 20-kg pediatric patient was 3.1 L/h. In 4 patients with elevated serum bilirubin levels, the estimated clearance was 0.6 L/h. Effect on activated plasma thromboplastin time (aPTT) was found to be concentration dependent. Simulations suggested that a starting dose of 0.75 mu g/kg/min in pediatric patients was comparable in performance to 2.0 mu g/kg/min approved in adults for attaining target aPTT and risk for bleeding. A dose increment step size of 0.25 mu g/kg/min was suitable for titration. The PK/PD of argatroban was reasonably characterized in pediatrics. Plasma concentration-aPTT relationship was used to derive a safe starting dose and titration scheme for the first time in pediatric patients and was incorporated into the US prescribing information for argatroban.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available