4.6 Article

Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of mucositis and peri-implantitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 927-933

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12291

Keywords

dental implant; diagnosis; inter-rater agreement; mucositis; peri-implantitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The objective was to assess the inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of mucositis and peri-implantitis. Material and Methods: Adult patients with >= 1 dental implant were eligible. Three operators examined the patients. One examiner allocated the patients to three groups of nine as follows: nine implants with peri-implantitis, nine implants with mucositis, and 9 implants with healthy mucosa. Each examiner recorded on all 27 patients (one implant per patient) recessions, probing depth, bleeding on probing, suppuration, keratinized tissue depth and bone loss, leading to a final diagnosis of mucositis, peri-implantitis or healthy mucosa. Examiners were independent and blinded to each other. Results: Fleiss k-statistic with quadratic weight in the diagnosis of peri-implantitis and mucositis was 0.66 [ CI95%: 0.45-0.87]. A complete agreement was obtained only in 14 cases (52%). Fleiss k-statistics in bleeding on probing and bone loss were respectively 0.31 [ CI95%: 0.20-0.41] and 0.70 [ CI95%: 0.45-0.94]. Intra-class correlation coefficients for recession, probing depth and keratinized tissue depth were respectively 0.69 [ CI95%: 0.62-0.75], 0.54 [ CI95%: 0.44-0.63] and 0.56 [ CI95%: 0.27-0.77]. Conclusions: The inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of peri-implant disease was qualified as merely good. This could also be due in part to the unclear definition of peri-implantitis and mucositis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available