4.6 Article

Genome-wide association study of chronic periodontitis in a general German population

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 11, Pages 977-985

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12154

Keywords

attachment loss; genome-wide association studies; periodontitis; Study of Health in Pomerania

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01ZZ9603, 01ZZ0103, 01ZZ0403, 03IS2061A, 03ZIK012]
  2. Ministry of Cultural Affairs
  3. Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania
  4. network Greifswald Approach to Individualized Medicine (GANI_MED)
  5. GABA, Switzerland
  6. Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany
  7. Federal State of Mecklenburg, West Pomerania
  8. [BMBF-01-ZZ-9603/0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo identify loci associated with chronic periodontitis through a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Materials and MethodsA GWAS was performed in 4032 individuals of two independent cross-sectional studies of West Pomerania (SHIP n=3365 and SHIP-TREND n=667) with different periodontal case definitions. Samples were genotyped with the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 or the Illumina Human Omni 2.5 array. Imputation of the HapMap as well as the 1000 Genome-based autosomal and X-chromosomal genotypes and short insertions and deletions (INDELs) was performed in both cohorts. Finally, more than 17 million SNPs and short INDELs were analysed. ResultsNo genome-wide significant associations were found for any periodontitis case definition, regardless of whether individuals aged >60years where excluded or not. Despite no single SNP association reached genome-wide significance, the proportion of variance explained by additive effects of all common SNPs was around 23% for mean proximal attachment loss. Excluding subjects aged >60years increased the explained variance to 34%. ConclusionsNo single SNPs were found to be genome-wide significantly associated with chronic periodontitis in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available