4.6 Article

Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of class II furcation: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 781-788

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12121

Keywords

chronic periodontitis; cytokines; furcation defects; microbiology; periodontal pocket; photochemotherapy; root planing

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [2010/51218-8]
  2. National Council for Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) [303693/2009-6]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as adjunct to mechanical therapy in furcations. Materials and Methods: A double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in subjects presenting class II furcations. The subjects were randomly allocated to a test (PDT; n = 16) or control group (non-activated laser/only photosensitizer; n = 21). At baseline, 3 and 6 months, clinical, microbiological and cytokine pattern evaluation was performed. Clinical attachment level was defined as the primary outcome variable. Results: Clinical parameters improved after both therapies (p < 0.05) with no differences between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). At 6 months, real-time PCR evaluation showed a decrease in Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia only in the PDT group (p < 0.05) with no inter-group differences. Regarding cytokines, IL-4 and IL-10 levels increased in both groups at 6 months. GM-CSF, IL-8, IL-1 beta and IL-6 levels decreased only in the PDT group after 3 months (p < 0.05). At 3 months, inter-group analyses showed that GM-CSF, IFN-gamma, IL-6 and IL-8 levels were lower in the PDT group. At 6 months, lower IL-1 beta levels were also observed in the PDT group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Photodynamic therapy did not promote clinical benefits for class II furcations; however, advantages in local levels of cytokines and a reduction in periodontopathogens were demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available