4.6 Article

Number of teeth, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen and cardiovascular mortality: a 15-year follow-up study in a Finnish cohort

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 131-140

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12192

Keywords

C-reactive protein; CVD mortality; fibrinogen; mediation analyses; number of teeth

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [0635351N]
  2. NIH [R01 EB010087, R21 MH097639, R01 AG-045136, RO1 HL115295, U01 NR004061]
  3. Neurology Research Education Program [U01 NINDS]
  4. Medical Society of Finland
  5. Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds
  6. USPHS [DE15566]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo test whether the number of teeth, an inverse proxy for composite oral infection scores is associated with better survival. Materials and MethodsThe Kuopio Oral Health and Heart study initiated a case-control study in 1995-1996 consisting of 256 consecutive coronary artery disease patients and 250 age and gender-matched controls. We appended the mortality data and formulated a longitudinal study. By May 31st, 2011, 124 mortalities had occurred and 80 of which were of cardiovascular origin. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we assessed the association of the teeth group (Teethgrp) - consisting of 10 teeth - with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality after 15.8years of median follow-up. ResultsIn multivariate models, with the edentulous state as reference, one level increase in Teethgrp was associated with significantly increased survival from cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality with a Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.73, p-value=0.02 but not with all-cause mortality (HR=0.87, p=0.13). The findings were not mediated by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels 3mg/L or by median fibrinogen levels, but were mediated by CRP levels >5mg/L. ConclusionEach increment of 10 teeth from the edentulous state was associated with a 27% improved CVD survival, independent of low-grade systemic inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available