4.6 Article

Effect of periodontal therapy on prevention of gastric Helicobacter pylori recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 1166-1173

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12015

Keywords

gastric mucosa; Helicobacter pylori; meta-analysis; periodontal disease; periodontal pocket; periodontal procedures; systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of this review is to assess the effect of dental plaque control and periodontal therapy on prevention of gastric Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) recurrence. Materials and Methods We conducted searches of electronic databases, and included controlled trials comparing periodontal treatment and eradication therapy of H. pylori with eradication therapy alone for prevention of recurrence of gastric H. pylori. We used the absence of recurrence of gastric H. pylori after the first 3 months as an outcome measure to determine relative risk of persistence of gastric H. pylori. We estimated the degree of heterogeneity among trial results using Q and I2 statistics. Results Three trials including 298 patients were eligible according to our inclusion criteria. As significant heterogeneity was indicated by the Q statistics (p = 0.04) and I2 (69%), we used a random-effects model to combine the data. Compared with eradication therapy alone, the adjunction of periodontal therapy significantly reduced the relative risk of persistence of gastric H. pylori by 63% (0.37 [95% CI 0.210.64], p = 0.0004) in patients with gastric diseases. Conclusions The adjunction of periodontal treatment to eradication therapy appears to reduce gastric H. pylori recurrence compared with eradication therapy alone among patients with gastric diseases associated with H. pylori. The results of this meta-analysis should be taken with caution because of the limitations in the primary data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available