Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 9, Pages 856-863Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01750.x
Keywords
diameter; failure rate; length; short implants; success rate
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aim: To test the null hypothesis of no difference in failure rates of short (minimum length: 7 mm) and longer dental implants (>= 10 mm), a meta-analysis was performed on prospective observational trials. Materials and Methods: A systematic electronic and hand search was performed to identify eligible studies. Having additional data supplied by the authors, 54 publications were included (19,083 implants). Results: In case of mandibular implants, the null hypothesis of no impact of reduced implant length on failure within the first year of prosthetic loading could not be rejected. A significant impact of implant length could be substantiated for short machined implants in the anterior [odds ratio (OR) 5.4] and posterior maxilla (OR 3.4), while short rough-surfaced implants demonstrated increased failure rates in the anterior maxillary sites. No influence of implant diameter and denture type on the failure rate of short implants could be revealed. Conclusion: In areas of reduced alveolar bone height the use of short dental implants may reduce the need for invasive bone augmentation procedures.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available