4.6 Review

The RANKL-OPG system in clinical periodontology

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 239-248

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01810.x

Keywords

diagnostics; gingival crevicular fluid; osteoprotegerin; periodontal disease; receptor activator of NF-?B ligand; receptor activator of NF-?B ligand; osteoprotegerin ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives: The receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand-osteoprotegerin (RANKL-OPG) bi-molecular system is the bottle-neck regulator of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption, both in physiological and pathological conditions. This review aims to elaborate the current knowledge on RANKL and OPG in periodontal disease, and to evaluate their diagnostic and prognostic potential as biomarkers of the disease. Materials and Methods: To pursue this aim, electronic and manual searches were performed for identifying clinical and in vivo studies on RANKL and OPG in gingival tissue, gingival crevicular fluid, saliva and blood. Smoking and diabetes mellitus were also considered for their potential effects. Results: Papers fulfilling the inclusion criteria demonstrate that RANKL is upregulated, whereas OPG is down-regulated in periodontitis, compared to periodontal health, resulting in an increased RANKL/OPG ratio. This ratio is further up-regulated in smokers and diabetics, and is not affected by conventional periodontal treatment. Conclusions: The increased RANKL/OPG ratio may serve as a biomarker that denotes the occurrence of periodontitis, but may not necessarily predict on-going disease activity. Its steadily elevated levels post treatment may indicate that the molecular mechanisms of bone resorption are still active, holding an imminent risk for relapse of the disease. Additional adjunct treatment modalities that would switch-off the RANKL/OPG ratio may therefore be required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available