Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 738-745Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01742.x
Keywords
biomaterial; bone substitute; defect fill; peri-implantitis; surgical treatment
Categories
Funding
- Institut Straumann AG
- Geistlich Pharma AG
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate a regenerative surgical treatment modality for peri-implantitis lesions on two different implant surfaces. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients with one crater-like defect, around either TPS (Control) or SLA (Test) dental implants, with a probing depth (PD) >= 6 mm and no implant mobility, were included. The implant surface was mechanically debrided and treated using a 24% EDTA gel and a 1% chlorhexidine gel. The bone defect was filled with a bovine-derived xenograft (BDX) and the flap was sutured around the non-submerged implant. Results: One-year follow-up demonstrated clinical and radiographic improvements. PDs were significantly reduced by 2.1 +/- 1.2 mm in the Control implants and by 3.4 +/- 1.7 mm in the Test implants. Complete defect fill was never found around Controls, while it occurred in three out of 12 Test implants. Bleeding on probing decreased from 91.1 +/- 12.4% (Control) and 75.0 +/- 30.2% (Test) to 57.1 +/- 38.5% (p = 0.004) and 14.6 +/- 16.7% (p = 0.003), respectively. Several deep pockets (>= 6 mm) were still present after surgical therapy around Controls. Conclusions: Surface characteristics may have an impact on the clinical outcome following surgical debridement, disinfection of the contaminated surfaces and grafting with BDX. Complete fill of the bony defect seems not to be a predictable result.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available