4.6 Article

Hydrogen-rich water attenuates experimental periodontitis in a rat model

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 1085-1090

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01801.x

Keywords

animal studies; antioxidants; hydrogen-rich water; oxidative stress; periodontitis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan [20791642]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20791642] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to the development of periodontitis. As molecular hydrogen can act as a scavenger of ROS, we examined the effects of treatment with hydrogen-rich water on a rat model of periodontitis. Material & Methods: A ligature was placed around the maxillary molars for 4 weeks to induce periodontitis, and the animals were given drinking water with or without hydrogen-rich water. Results: The rats with periodontitis which were treated with pure water showed a time-dependent increase in serum ROS level. Compared with the rats without periodontitis, the periodontitis-induced rats which were given pure water also showed polymorphonuclear leucocyte infiltration and alveolar bone loss at 4 weeks. Hydrogen-rich water intake inhibited an increase in serum ROS level and lowered expression of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and nitrotyrosine in the periodontal tissue at 4 weeks. Such conditions prevented polymorphonuclear leucocyte infiltration and osteoclast differentiation following periodontitis progression. Furthermore, inflammatory signalling pathways, such as mitogen-activated protein kinases, were less activated in periodontal lesions from hydrogen-rich water-treated rats as compared with pure water-treated rats. Conclusion: Consuming hydrogen-rich water might be beneficial in suppressing periodontitis progression by decreasing gingival oxidative stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available