4.6 Article

Raised chondroitin sulphate WF6 epitope levels in gingival crevicular fluid in chronic periodontitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 871-876

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01312.x

Keywords

chondroitin sulphate; chronic periodontitis; gingival crevicular fluid; glycosaminoglycans; WF6 monoclonal antibody

Funding

  1. Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University
  2. Commissions on Higher Education [RMU 5080035]
  3. Thailand Research Fund
  4. National Research Council of Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To determine the levels of chondroitin sulphate (CS) WF6 epitope, recognized by WF6 monoclonal antibody, in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) from different stages of periodontal disease and healthy periodontium, and to correlate those levels with clinical parameters. Materials and Methods: GCF samples, collected from 389 sites, were analysed for the WF6 epitope levels by the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The median WF6 epitope level was significantly higher in chronic periodontitis sites (n=185) than in healthy and gingivitis sites (n=204) (p < 0.001), whereas the median levels did not significantly differ between healthy (n=65) and gingivitis sites (n=139). The median level in severe periodontitis sites (n=60) was significantly higher than that in moderate periodontitis sites (n=63) (p=0.019). Similarly, the median level in moderate periodontitis sites was significantly higher than that in slight periodontitis sites (n=62) (p=0.001). The WF6 epitope levels significantly correlated with probing depth (r=0.777, p=0.001) and loss of clinical attachment level (r=0.814, p=0.001). Conclusion: Elevated CS WF6 epitope levels in GCF are associated with severity of periodontitis. The WF6 antibody may therefore be clinically applied to monitor disease severity and progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available