4.6 Article

Plastid genomes reveal support for deep phylogenetic relationships and extensive rate variation among palms and other commelinid monocots

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 209, Issue 2, Pages 855-870

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13617

Keywords

Arecaceae; chloroplast; Palmae; phylogenomics; plastome; Poaceae; rate heterogeneity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0830020, DEB-0830009, DEB-0829849, DEB-0829762]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences [0830020] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite progress based on multilocus, phylogenetic studies of the palms (order Arecales, family Arecaceae), uncertainty remains in resolution/support among major clades and for the placement of the palms among the commelinid monocots. Palms and related commelinids represent a classic case of substitution rate heterogeneity that has not been investigated in the genomic era. To address questions of relationships, support and rate variation among palms and commelinid relatives, 39 plastomes representing the palms and related family Dasypogonaceae were generated via genome skimming and integrated within a monocot-wide matrix for phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses. Support was strong for 'deep' relationships among the commelinid orders, among the five palm subfamilies, and among tribes of the subfamily Coryphoideae. Additionally, there was extreme heterogeneity in the plastid substitution rates across the commelinid orders indicated by model based analyses, with c. 22 rate shifts, and significant departure from a global clock. To date, this study represents the most comprehensively sampled matrix of plastomes assembled for monocot angiosperms, providing genome-scale support for phylogenetic relationships of monocot angiosperms, and lays the phylogenetic groundwork for comparative analyses of the drivers and correlates of such drastic differences in substitution rates across a diverse and significant clade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available