4.6 Article

Manipulating stomatal density enhances drought tolerance without deleterious effect on nutrient uptake

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 208, Issue 2, Pages 336-341

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13598

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; drought tolerance; epidermal patterning factor (EPF); mass flow; nitrate; stomata; transpiration; water use efficiency

Categories

Funding

  1. BBSRC
  2. EPSRC
  3. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  4. BBSRC [BB/N004167/1, BB/I002154/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N004167/1, BB/I002154/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1248095] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manipulation of stomatal density was investigated as a potential tool for enhancing drought tolerance or nutrient uptake. Drought tolerance and soil water retention were assessed using Arabidopsis epidermal patterning factor mutants manipulated to have increased or decreased stomatal density. Root nutrient uptake via mass flow was monitored under differing plant watering regimes using nitrogen-15 (N-15) isotope and mass spectrometry. Plants with less than half of their normal complement of stomata, and correspondingly reduced levels of transpiration, conserve soil moisture and are highly drought tolerant but show little or no reduction in shoot nitrogen concentrations especially when water availability is restricted. By contrast, plants with over twice the normal density of stomata have a greater capacity for nitrogen uptake, except when water availability is restricted. We demonstrate the possibility of producing plants with reduced transpiration which have increased drought tolerance, with little or no loss of nutrient uptake. We demonstrate that increasing transpiration can enhance nutrient uptake when water is plentiful.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available