4.6 Article

CASSIA - a dynamic model for predicting intra-annual sink demand and interannual growth variation in Scots pine

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 206, Issue 2, Pages 647-659

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13275

Keywords

carbon (C) balance; dynamic modelling; growth variation; ontogenetic development; phenology; sink-source dynamics; thermal time; xylogenesis

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence Program [1118615]
  2. project 'Multi-scale modelling of tree growth, forest ecosystems, and their environmental control' [257641]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The control of tree growth vs environment by carbon sources or sinks remains unresolved although it is widely studied. This study investigates growth of tree components and carbon sink-source dynamics at different temporal scales. We constructed a dynamic growth model carbon allocation sink source interaction' (CASSIA) that calculates tree-level carbon balance from photosynthesis, respiration, phenology and temperature-driven potential structural growth of tree organs and dynamics of stored nonstructural carbon (NSC) and their modifying influence on growth. With the model, we tested hypotheses that sink demand explains the intra-annual growth dynamics of the meristems, and that the source supply is further needed to explain year-to-year growth variation. The predicted intra-annual dimensional growth of shoots and needles and the number of cells in xylogenesis phases corresponded with measurements, whereas NSC hardly limited the growth, supporting the first hypothesis. Delayed GPP influence on potential growth was necessary for simulating the yearly growth variation, indicating also at least an indirect source limitation. CASSIA combines seasonal growth and carbon balance dynamics with long-term source dynamics affecting growth and thus provides a first step to understanding the complex processes regulating intra- and interannual growth and sink-source dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available