4.4 Article

Decimal numbers and safe interpretation of clinical pathology results

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 179-181

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201865

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Queensland Emergency Medicine Research Foundation [QEMRF-EMSS-12-184]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To determine the understanding of decimal numbers by medical laboratory scientists, doctors and nurses. Methods A Decimal Comparison Test determined the comprehension of decimals numbers. Additional questions sought the participants' understanding of concentrations and reference ranges, and their preferences for the presentation of clinical pathology results. Results Of the 108 participants, 40% exhibited poor comprehension of decimal numbers. One-third of the medical laboratory scientists, a quarter of doctors, and half the nurses were characterised as lacking numeracy skills. The majority of participants (60%) thought it would be safer for results to be presented as whole numbers rather than as decimals with leading zeros. Conclusions The number of laboratory and clinical staff who show numeracy issues that could lead to misinterpretation of clinical pathology results and contribute to medical error strongly supports recommendations that pathology results should be presented as whole numbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available