4.6 Article

A flexible multi-species genome-wide 60K SNP chip developed from pooled resequencing of 240 Eucalyptus tree genomes across 12 species

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 206, Issue 4, Pages 1527-1540

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13322

Keywords

Myrtaceae; pooled resequencing; population structure; single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) ascertainment bias; trans-species SNPs

Categories

Funding

  1. FAP-DF [03.11.01.007.00.00]
  2. EMBRAPA
  3. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used whole genome resequencing of pooled individuals to develop a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip for Eucalyptus. Genomes of 240 trees of 12 species were sequenced at 3.5x each, and 46997586 raw SNP variants were subject to multivariable filtering metrics toward a multispecies, genome-wide distributed chip content. Of the 60904 SNPs on the chip, 59222 were genotyped and 51204 were polymorphic across 14 Eucalyptus species, providing a 96% genome-wide coverage with 1 SNP/12-20kb, and 47069 SNPs at 10kb from 30444 of the 33917 genes in the Eucalyptus genome. Given the EUChip60K multi-species genotyping flexibility, we show that both the sample size and taxonomic composition of cluster files impact heterozygous call specificity and sensitivity by benchmarking against gold standard' genotypes derived from deeply sequenced individual tree genomes. Thousands of SNPs were shared across species, likely representing ancient variants arisen before the split of these taxa, hinting to a recent eucalypt radiation. We show that the variable SNP filtering constraints allowed coverage of the entire site frequency spectrum, mitigating SNP ascertainment bias. The EUChip60K represents an outstanding tool with which to address population genomics questions in Eucalyptus and to empower genomic selection, GWAS and the broader study of complex trait variation in eucalypts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available