4.6 Review

Conifer genomics and adaptation: at the crossroads of genetic diversity and genome function

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 209, Issue 1, Pages 44-62

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13565

Keywords

Coniferales; gene expression; genome evolution; genomics of adaptation; next generation sequencing (NGS); RNA-sequencing; speciation-by-adaptation

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Quebec Ministry of the Economy, Innovation and Exports
  3. Genome Canada
  4. Genome Quebec
  5. Genome British Columbia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conifers have been understudied at the genomic level despite their worldwide ecological and economic importance but the situation is rapidly changing with the development of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. With NGS, genomics research has simultaneously gained in speed, magnitude and scope. In just a few years, genomes of 20-24 gigabases have been sequenced for several conifers, with several others expected in the near future. Biological insights have resulted from recent sequencing initiatives as well as genetic mapping, gene expression profiling and gene discovery research over nearly two decades. We review the knowledge arising from conifer genomics research emphasizing genome evolution and the genomic basis of adaptation, and outline emerging questions and knowledge gaps. We discuss future directions in three areas with potential inputs from NGS technologies: the evolutionary impacts of adaptation in conifers based on the adaptation-by-speciation model; the contributions of genetic variability of gene expression in adaptation; and the development of a broader understanding of genetic diversity and its impacts on genome function. These research directions promise to sustain research aimed at addressing the emerging challenges of adaptation that face conifer trees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available