4.6 Article

Long-term nitrogen deposition linked to reduced water use efficiency in forests with low phosphorus availability

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 210, Issue 2, Pages 431-442

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13785

Keywords

herbarium specimens; nitrogen:phosphorus (N:P); P-limited soils; delta C-13; delta N-15

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371269, 31570604]
  2. National '973' Program of China [2014CB954002]
  3. European Research Council [ERC-2013-SyG-610028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of long-term nitrogen (N) deposition is under-studied in phosphorus (P)-limited subtropical forests. We exploited historically collected herbarium specimens to investigate potential physiological responses of trees in three subtropical forests representing an urban-to-rural gradient, across which N deposition has probably varied over the past six decades. We measured foliar [N] and [P] and stable carbon (C-13), oxygen (O-18) and nitrogen (N-15) isotopic compositions in tissue from herbarium specimens of plant species collected from 1947 to 2014. Foliar [N] and N:P increased, and N-15 and [P] decreased in the two forests close to urban centers. Consistent with recent studies demonstrating that N deposition in the region is N-15-depleted, these data suggest that the increased foliar [N] and N:P, and decreased [P], may be attributable to atmospheric deposition and associated enhancement of P limitation. Estimates of intrinsic water use efficiency calculated from foliar C-13 decreased by c. 30% from the 1950s to 2014, contrasting with multiple studies investigating similar parameters in N-limited forests. This effect may reflect decreased photosynthesis, as suggested by a conceptual model of foliar C-13 and O-18. Long-term N deposition may exacerbate P limitation and mitigate projected increases in carbon stocks driven by elevated CO2 in forests on P-limited soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available