4.6 Article

Double-Fock superposition interferometry for differential diagnosis of decoherence

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023008

Keywords

decoherence; entangled states; interferometry; non-classical states of photons; photon counting and statistics

Funding

  1. Villum foundation
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research
  3. National Junior Research Fellowship [2012-000642]
  4. DAAD
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A2A1A01006029]
  6. Villum Fonden [00007335] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A2A1A01006029] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interferometric signals are degraded by decoherence, which encompasses dephasing, mixing and any distinguishing which-path information. These three paradigmatic processes are fundamentally different, but, for coherent, single-photon and N00N-states, they degrade interferometric visibility in the very same way, which impedes the diagnosis of the cause for reduced visibility in a single experiment. We introduce a versatile formalism for many-boson interferometry based on double-sided Feynman diagrams, which we apply to a protocol for differential decoherence diagnosis: twin-Fock states vertical bar N, N > with N >= 2 reveal to what extent decoherence is due to path distinguishability or to mixing, while double-Fock superpositions vertical bar N: M > = (vertical bar N, M > + vertical bar M, N >)/root 2 with N > M > 0 additionally witness the degree of dephasing. Hence, double-Fock superposition interferometry permits the differential diagnosis of decoherence processes in a single experiment, indispensable for the assessment of interferometers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available