4.7 Article

Significant Improvement in Survival After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation During a Period of Significantly Increased Use, Older Recipient Age, and Use of Unrelated Donors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 19, Pages 2437-2449

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.6193

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  3. NHLBI [5U01HL069294]
  4. NCI
  5. Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH234200637015C]
  6. Office of Naval Research [N00014-06-1-0704, N00014-08-1-0058]
  7. Allos
  8. Amgen
  9. Angioblast
  10. Ariad
  11. Be the Match Foundation
  12. BlueCross BlueShield Association
  13. Buchanan Family Foundation
  14. CaridianBCT
  15. Celgene
  16. Celgene, CellGenix
  17. Children's Leukemia Research Association
  18. Fresenius-Biotech North America
  19. Gamida Cell Teva Joint Venture
  20. Genentech
  21. Genzyme
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. HistoGenetics
  24. Kiadis Pharma
  25. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  26. Medical College of Wisconsin
  27. Merck
  28. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  29. Takeda Oncology
  30. Milliman USA
  31. Miltenyi Biotec
  32. National Marrow Donor Program
  33. Optum Healthcare Solutions
  34. Osiris Therapeutics
  35. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical
  36. Remedy MD
  37. sanofi-aventis
  38. Seattle Genetics
  39. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  40. Soligenix
  41. StemCyte
  42. Stemsoft Software
  43. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  44. Tarix Pharmaceuticals
  45. Teva Neuroscience
  46. THERAKOS
  47. Wellpoint

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Over the past four decades, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) has evolved as a curative modality for patients with hematologic diseases. This study describes changes in use, technique, and survival in a population-based cohort. Patients and Methods The study included 38,060 patients with hematologic malignancies or disorders who underwent first alloHCT in a US or Canadian center from 1994 to 2005 and were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Results AlloHCT as treatment for acute lymphoblastic (ALL) and myeloid leukemias (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas increased by 45%, from 2,520 to 3,668 patients annually. From 1994 to 2005, use of both peripheral (7% to 6%) and cord blood increased (2% to 10%), whereas use of marrow decreased (90% to 27%). Despite a median age increase from 33 to 40 years and % increase in unrelated donors for alloHCT, overall survival (OS) at day 100 significantly improved for patients with AML in first complete remission after myeloablative sibling alloHCT (85% to 94%; P < .001) and unrelated alloHCT (63% to 86%; P < .001); 1-year OS improved among those undergoing unrelated alloHCT (48% to 63%; P = .003) but not among those undergoing sibling alloHCT. Similar results were seen for ALL and MDS. Day-100 OS after cord blood alloHCT improved significantly from 60% to 78% (P < .001) for AML, ALL, MDS, and chronic myeloid leukemia. Use of reduced-intensity regimens increased, yielding OS rates similar to those of myeloablative regimens. Conclusion Survival for those undergoing alloHCT has significantly improved over time. However, new approaches are needed to further improve 1-year OS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available