4.7 Article

Phase III Trial of Cetuximab With Continuous or Intermittent Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) Versus FLOX Alone in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The NORDIC-VII Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 15, Pages 1755-1762

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0915

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Kjell Magne Tveit
  2. Merck Serono
  3. sanofi-aventis
  4. Bengt Glimelius
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Per Pfeiffer
  7. Roche
  8. Halfdan Sorbye
  9. Seppo Pyrhonen
  10. Anders Johnsson
  11. Fridbjorn Sigurdsson
  12. Merck Serono (Darmstadt, Germany)
  13. sanofi-aventis (Oslo, Norway)
  14. Norwegian Cancer Society
  15. Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The NORDIC-VII multicenter phase III trial investigated the efficacy of cetuximab when added to bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX), administered continuously or intermittently, in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on treatment outcome was also investigated. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard Nordic FLOX (arm A), cetuximab and FLOX (arm B), or cetuximab combined with intermittent FLOX (arm C). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), response rate, R0 resection rate, and safety were secondary end points. Results Of the 571 patients randomly assigned, 566 were evaluable in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. KRAS and BRAF mutation analyses were obtained in 498 (88%) and 457 patients (81%), respectively. KRAS mutations were present in 39% of the tumors; 12% of tumors had BRAF mutations. The presence of BRAF mutations was a strong negative prognostic factor. In the ITT population, median PFS was 7.9, 8.3, and 7.3 months for the three arms, respectively (not significantly different). OS was almost identical for the three groups (20.4, 19.7, 20.3 months, respectively), and confirmed response rates were 41%, 49%, and 47%, respectively. In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, cetuximab did not provide any additional benefit compared with FLOX alone. In patients with KRAS mutations, no significant difference was detected, although a trend toward improved PFS was observed in arm B. The regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion Cetuximab did not add significant benefit to the Nordic FLOX regimen in first-line treatment of mCRC. J Clin Oncol 30:1755-1762. (c) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available