4.6 Article

Finite-key security analysis of quantum key distribution with imperfect light sources

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/093011

Keywords

quantum key distribution; security analysis; quantum optics

Funding

  1. JSPS [25247068]
  2. Galician Regional Government (program 'Ayudas para proyectos de investigacion desarrollados por investigadores emergentes', and consolidation of Research Units: AtlantTIC)
  3. Spanish Government [TEC2014-54898-R]
  4. National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) of Japan (Project 'Secure Photonic Network Technology' as part of Project UQCC)
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25247068] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the gap between theory and practice in quantum key distribution (QKD) has been significantly narrowed, particularly for QKD systems with arbitrarily flawed optical receivers. The status for QKD systems with imperfect light sources is however less satisfactory, in the sense that the resulting secure key rates are often overly dependent on the quality of state preparation. This is especially the case when the channel loss is high. Very recently, to overcome this limitation, Tamaki et al proposed a QKD protocol based on the so-called 'rejected data analysis', and showed that its security-in the limit of infinitely long keys-is almost independent of any encoding flaw in the qubit space, being this protocol compatible with the decoy state method. Here, as a step towards practical QKD, we show that a similar conclusion is reached in the finite-key regime, even when the intensity of the light source is unstable. More concretely, we derive security bounds for a wide class of realistic light sources and show that the bounds are also efficient in the presence of high channel loss. Our results strongly suggest the feasibility of long distance provably secure communication with imperfect light sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available