4.6 Article

Effect of loss on multiplexed single-photon sources

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043057

Keywords

photon; quantum; multiplexed; loss; optics; photonics; error

Funding

  1. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-14-1-0133]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K023063/1, EP/K021931/1, EP/J017175/1, EP/L024020/1, EP/K033085/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/K033085/1, EP/L024020/1, EP/J017175/1, EP/K021931/1, EP/K023063/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An on-demand single-photon source is a key requirement for scaling many optical quantum technologies. A promising approach to realize an on-demand single-photon source is to multiplex an array of heralded single-photon sources using an active optical switching network. However, the performance of multiplexed sources is degraded by photon loss in the optical components and the non-unit detection efficiency of the heralding detectors. We provide a theoretical description of a general multiplexed single-photon source with lossy components and derive expressions for the output probabilities of single-photon emission and multi-photon contamination. We apply these expressions to three specific multiplexing source architectures and consider their tradeoffs in design and performance. To assess the effect of lossy components on near-and long-term experimental goals, we simulate the multiplexed sources when used for many-photon state generation under various amounts of component loss. We find that with a multiplexed source composed of switches with similar to 0.2-0.4 dB loss and high efficiency number-resolving detectors, a single-photon source capable of efficiently producing 20-40 photon states with low multi-photon contamination is possible, offering the possibility of unlocking new classes of experiments and technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available