4.7 Article

Prognostic Significance of the European LeukemiaNet Standardized System for Reporting Cytogenetic and Molecular Alterations in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 36, Pages 4515-4523

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4738

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD [CA101140, CA114725, CA140158, CA31946, CA33601, CA16058, CA77658, CA129657]
  2. Coleman Leukemia Research Foundation
  3. Deutsche Krebshilfe-Dr. Mildred Scheel Cancer Foundation
  4. Novartis
  5. Ariad

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To evaluate the prognostic significance of the international European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines for reporting genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods We analyzed 1,550 adults with primary AML, treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B first-line trials, who had pretreatment cytogenetics and, for cytogenetically normal patients, mutational status of NPM1, CEBPA, and FLT3 available. We compared complete remission (CR) rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) among patients classified into the four ELN genetic groups (favorable, intermediate-I, intermediate-II, adverse) separately for 818 younger (age < 60 years) and 732 older (age >= 60 years) patients. Results The percentages of younger versus older patients in the favorable (41% v 20%; P<.001), intermediate-II (19% v 30%; P<.001), and adverse (22% v 31%; P<.001) genetic groups differed. The favorable group had the best and the adverse group the worst CR rates, DFS, and OS in both age groups. Both intermediate groups had significantly worse outcomes than the favorable but better than the adverse group. Intermediate-I and intermediate-II groups in older patients had similar outcomes, whereas the intermediate-II group in younger patients had better OS but not better CR rates or DFS than the intermediate-I group. The prognostic significance of ELN classification was confirmed by multivariable analyses. For each ELN group, older patients had worse outcomes than younger patients. Conclusion The ELN classification clearly separates the genetic groups by outcome, supporting its use for risk stratification in clinical trials. Because they have different proportions of genetic alterations and outcomes, younger and older patients should be reported separately when using the ELN classification. J Clin Oncol 30:4515-4523. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available