4.7 Article

Mammographic Density, Response to Hormones, and Breast Cancer Risk

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 22, Pages 2985-2992

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.7964

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of Canada [009237]
  2. Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance
  3. Lee and Margaret K. Lau Chair in Breast Cancer Research
  4. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer that changes in response to changes in hormone exposure. We have examined the magnitude of the association of hormone exposure with PMD according to subsequent breast cancer risk. Methods In three case-control studies, with 1,164 patient cases and 1,155 controls nested in cohorts of women screened with mammography, we examined the association of PMD measured in the baseline mammogram with risk of breast cancer in the following 1 to 8 years (mean, 3 years), according to use of oral contraceptives (OCs) in premenopausal women, menopause, and hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women. All statistical comparisons are adjusted for age and other risk factors. Results In premenopausal women who later developed breast cancer (patient cases), PMD was 5.3% greater in past users of OCs than in nonusers (P = .06). In controls, OC users had 2% less density than nonusers (P = .44; test for interaction P = .06). The difference in PMD between premenopausal and postmenopausal women for patient cases was 8.5% (P < .001) and for controls, 3.9% (P = .01; test for interaction P = .03). In postmenopausal women, PMD was 6% greater in patients who used HT than in never users (P < .001). Controls who used HT had 1.6% greater PMD (P = .26) than never users (test for interaction P = .001). Differences in PMD resulted mainly from differences in the dense area of the mammogram. Conclusion Differences in PMD associated with differences in hormone exposure were greater in women who later developed breast cancer than in controls in each of the hormone exposures examined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available