4.7 Article

Early Prediction of Nonprogression in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Erlotinib By Using [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose and [18F]Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 13, Pages 1701-1708

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4939

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Positron emission tomography (PET) with both 2'-deoxy-2'-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) and 3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine (FLT) was evaluated with respect to the accuracy of early prediction of nonprogression following erlotinib therapy, independent from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational status, in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Thirty-four patients with untreated stage IV NSCLC were evaluated in this phase II trial. Changes in FDG and FLT uptake after 1 (early) and 6 (late) weeks of erlotinib treatment were compared with nonprogression measured by computed tomography after 6 weeks of treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Changes in FDG uptake after 1 week of therapy predicted nonprogression after 6 weeks of therapy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (P = .02). Furthermore, patients with an early metabolic FDG response (cutoff value: 30% reduction in the peak standardized uptake value) had significantly longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.59; P = .002) and OS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.96; P = .04). Early FLT response also predicted significantly longer PFS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.95; P = .04) but not OS and was not predictive for nonprogression after 6 weeks of therapy. Conclusion Early FDG-PET predicts PFS, OS, and nonprogression after 6 weeks of therapy with erlotinib in unselected, previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC independent from EGFR mutational status. J Clin Oncol 29:1701-1708. (C) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available