4.7 Article

Incidence and Risk of Congestive Heart Failure in Patients With Renal and Nonrenal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Sunitinib

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 25, Pages 3450-3456

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4309

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Trust Family Research Fund for Kidney Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Sunitinib is a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and GI stromal tumor. Congestive heart failure (CHF) is an important adverse effect that has been reported with sunitinib, but overall incidence and relative risk (RR) remain undefined. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the risk of developing CHF in patients with both RCC and non-RCC tumors treated with sunitinib. Methods Medline databases were searched for articles published between January 1966 and February 2011. Eligible studies were limited to phase II and III trials of sunitinib with adequate safety reporting in patients with cancer of any tumor type. Summary incidence, RR, and 95% CIs were calculated using random-or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. Results A total of 6,935 patients were included. Overall incidence for all-and high-grade CHF in sunitinib-treated patients was 4.1% (95% CI, 1.5% to 10.6%) and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8% to 3.0%), respectively. RR of all-and high-grade CHF in sunitinib-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.30 to 2.50; P < .001) and 3.30 (95% CI, 1.29 to 8.45; P = .01), respectively. On subgroup analysis, there was no difference observed in CHF incidence for patients with RCC versus non-RCC or in trials with or without cardiac monitoring. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusion Sunitinib use is associated with increased risk of CHF in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:3450-3456. (C) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available