4.7 Article

Expression Signature of E2F1 and Its Associated Genes Predict Superficial to Invasive Progression of Bladder Tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 16, Pages 2660-2667

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0977

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2009-0063260, 20090083310, FG06-11-06, FG-4-2]
  2. Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
  3. University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose In approximately 20% of patients with superficial bladder tumors, the tumors progress to invasive tumors after treatment. Current methods of predicting the clinical behavior of these tumors prospectively are unreliable. We aim to identify a molecular signature that can reliably identify patients with high-risk superficial tumors that are likely to progress to invasive tumors. Patients and Methods Gene expression data were collected from tumor specimens from 165 patients with bladder cancer. Various statistical methods, including leave-one-out cross-validation methods, were applied to identify a gene expression signature that could predict the likelihood of progression to invasive tumors and to test the robustness of the expression signature in an independent cohort. The robustness of the gene expression signature was validated in an independent (n = 353) cohort. Results Supervised analysis of gene expression data revealed a gene expression signature that is strongly associated with invasive bladder tumors. A molecular classifier based on this gene expression signature correctly predicted the likelihood of progression of superficial tumor to invasive tumor. Conclusion We present a molecular signature that can predict, at diagnosis, the likelihood of bladder cancer progression and, possibly, lead to improvements in patient therapy. J Clin Oncol 28:2660-2667. (C) 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available