4.7 Article

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 Codon 132 Mutation Is an Important Prognostic Biomarker in Gliomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 25, Pages 4150-4154

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9832

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Institut National du Cancer [PL 046]
  2. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Unexpected mutations affecting the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1) gene at codon 132 have been found in 12% of glioblastomas. Patients and Methods IDH1 codon 132 sequencing was performed in a series of 404 patients with glioma (100 grade 2, 121 grade 3, and 183 grade 4 gliomas) and correlated with histology, genomic profile, methylguanyl methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and outcome. Results A total of 155 codon 132 mutations were found, of which 131 were Arg132His (88.5%). The IDH1 mutation was inversely correlated with grade, affecting 77% of grade 2, 55% of grade 3, and 6% of grade 4 gliomas (P < 10(-15)). The IDH1 mutation was tightly associated with a 1p19q codeleted genotype (P < 10(-14)) and an MGMT methylated status (P < .001) but mutually exclusive with EGFR amplification (P < 10(-15)) and loss of chromosome 10 (P < 10(-15)). The presence (v absence) of IDH1 mutation was associated with a better outcome in grade 2 (150.9 v 60.1 months, respectively; P = .01), grade 3 (81.1 v 19.4 months, respectively; P < .001), and grade 4 gliomas (27.4 v 14 months, respectively; P < .01). After adjustment for grade, age, MGMT status, genomic profile, and treatment, multivariate analysis confirmed that IDH1 mutation was an independent favorable prognostic marker (hazard ratio = 0.297; 95% CI, 0.157 to 0.564, P = .00021). Conclusion This study indicates that IDH1 codon 132 mutation is closely linked to the genomic profile of the tumor and constitutes an important prognostic marker in grade 2 to 4 gliomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available