4.7 Article

Rel A Is an Independent Biomarker of Clinical Outcome in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 763-769

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.1114

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Leukemia Research (UK)
  2. Leukemia Research Appeal for Wales
  3. Welsh Bone Marrow Transplant Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose We recently demonstrated the biologic importance of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) subunit Rel A in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and hypothesized that Rel A DNA binding would have prognostic significance in this disease. Patients and Methods Rel A DNA binding was quantified in nuclear extracts derived from 131 unselected CLL patient samples using a quantitative DNA-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based method. We then investigated the ability of Rel A to predict for the requirement for treatment and survival and compared our findings with other established prognostic markers. Results Rel A DNA binding was strongly associated with advanced Binet stage (P < .0001) but did not correlate with immunoglobulin V-H (IgVH) mutation status (P = .25), CD38 expression (P = .87), or zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP-70) expression (P = .55). It was predictive of time to first treatment (P = .02) and time to subsequent treatment (P = .0001). In addition, Rel A was the most predictive marker of survival both from date of diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 9.1; P = .01) and date of entry into the study (HR, 3.9; P = .05) and retained prognostic significance in multivariate analysis for both time to first treatment and overall survival in the presence of Binet stage, IgVH mutation status, CD38, and ZAP-70. Conclusion Rel A is an independent prognostic marker of survival in CLL and seems to have the unique capacity to predict the duration of response to therapy. Prospective assessment of Rel A as a marker of clinical outcome and as a therapeutic target are now warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available