4.8 Article

ClinGen - The Clinical Genome Resource

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 372, Issue 23, Pages 2235-2242

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr1406261

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  3. National Cancer Institute [U41 HG006834, U01 HG007436, U01 HG007437, HHSN261200800001E]
  4. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Library of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On autopsy, a patient is found to have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The patient's family pursues genetic testing that shows a likely pathogenic variant for the condition on the basis of a study in an original research publication. Given the dominant inheritance of the condition and the risk of sudden cardiac death, other family members are tested for the genetic variant to determine their risk. Several family members test negative and are told that they are not at risk for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sudden cardiac death, and those who test positive are told that they need to be regularly monitored for cardiomyopathy on echocardiography. Five years later, during a routine clinic visit of one of the genotype-positive family members, the cardiologist queries a database for current knowledge on the genetic variant and discovers that the variant is now interpreted as likely benign by another laboratory that uses more recently derived population-frequency data. A newly available testing panel for additional genes that are implicated in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is initiated on an affected family member, and a different variant is found that is determined to be pathogenic. Family members are retested, and one member who previously tested negative is now found to be positive for this new variant. An immediate clinical workup detects evidence of cardiomyopathy, and an intracardiac defibrillator is implanted to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available